| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (59)

Posted: Aug 1st 2007 8:31AM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The 360 and PS3 can run games better than probably 75-90% of PC's out there being gamed on. They could probably handle the game on the lower settings. But they'd still have to do a ton of work to get the engine ported over. That'd be harder than the game, no?

Posted: Aug 1st 2007 8:41AM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because Ben at a forum the other day said they didn't have enough space to recreate every single texture in the entire PGR4 game to add night races, and instead had to modify the textures to display 4 or more different daytime weather conditions.

Massive games, beautiful games, and great games that fit on DVD9 are absolutely no reason that we don't need high capacity discs. Sony was right to attribute well over $100 in cost to adding high capacity discs instead of putting that cost into RAM, processing power, HDD space, and/or cost savings to the gamer. Do not ever question Sony again. They are right no matter what.

We absolutely need to spend $140 or so extra to have high capacity discs. That money would not be better spent on RAM or anything else. Just look at how massive, beautiful, and totally awesome most blu-ray games are compared to DVD9. Not even close. Mass Effect is half the size of Heavenly in Gigs. Blu-ray FTW!

How'd I do Vid? Did I make you proud? ;)

Posted: Aug 1st 2007 9:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this is the most waiting game for PC, !!is going to be the best game jungle experience ever; ala movie
Predator 1......

Posted: Aug 1st 2007 11:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EA label...nope, dont care.

Posted: Aug 1st 2007 12:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is not a game developed by EA;
* EA is the publisher
* Crytek is the developer
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2007 2:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There is still an EA label. That means that EA is getting money from it. Therefore, it falls into my boycotting EA policy.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 5:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HOLD ON:

If we look past the amazing graphics, does Crysis really stand out from the generic shooter pack? Do we even know a single thing about this game besides it has great graphics? I dont.

If you do, then please elaborate, because all I hear about is the graphics, and have heard nothing about anything else.

Posted: Aug 5th 2007 8:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Depending on Crytek's track record with Far Cry.

What makes it as unique is the supposedly sandbox approach to how the player must complete his objective: Snipe, stealth, just plain blow crap up, etc. Along with the unique Halo-ish Nanosuit the gamer is wearing that has some interesting abilities like speed, agility, strength and so on.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2007 12:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Posted this on Mark Rein's take on PC:

"What makes PC gaming special?

Democracy, thanks to the mod community support. Where you can create anything out of any games' SDK, from new weapons to a whole new game. The developers for PC games really encourage their players to do more than just playing.

And also, nude patches. Remember Tecmo's Dead Or Alive nude patch debacle? Further proof that consoles are less democratic than the PC. It gets worse with GTA's hot coffee.

Hell, there's no real democracy in console gaming these days, and having to hump your kill isn't one of them.

Real future of consoles? Open-source consoles. Surely you know what that means."

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW